Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 22: e239938, Jan.-Dec. 2023. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1523145

ABSTRACT

Buccolingual position of teeth could affect the prevalence of alveolar bone defects. Presence of alveolar defects may have a deleterious effect on orthodontic treatment. The aim was to assess the prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration in Class I hyperdivergent subjects and correlate it with buccolingual inclinations(BL) of maxillary first molar teeth. Methods: This retrospective study involved 80 CBCTs of class I hyperdivergent subjects divided into two groups - group A (n=33) buccolingual inclination >9º and group B (n=47) buccolingual inclination <9º. Prevalence and extent of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestrations were measured in CBCTs using OSIRIX Lite software. Descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test and Spearman correlation were done for evaluating intergroup differences and correlation with Buccolingual inclination. Results: Overall prevalence of dehiscence and fenestration in maxillary first molars was 60.95% and 5% respectively. In the buccal alveolar bone, prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group A (84.6%) for 16 and in the lingual alveolar bone prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group B (71.4%) for 26 . On intergroup comparison, the extent of lingual alveolar bone dehiscence (26) in group B was significantly higher (p value <0.05) than in group A. No significant correlation between the extent of dehiscence and fenestration with buccolingual inclination of molar teeth was noted. Conclusion: Molar teeth with BL inclinations of more than 9º had higher prevalence of dehiscence on the buccal side and molar teeth with BL inclinations less than 9 degrees had more dehiscence on the lingual side. But no significant correlation of BL inclination with prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration was noted


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Maxillary Diseases/epidemiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/epidemiology , Molar/abnormalities , Maxillary Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging
2.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 2022. 180 f p. tab, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1399659

ABSTRACT

A tomada de decisões na prática da clínica odontológica está baseada na utilização de parâmetros periodontais como o nível de osso alveolar e de inserção clínica, desconsiderando a idade do paciente, podendo resultar em extrações desnecessárias de dentes que ainda possuem suporte periodontal capaz de manter o elemento dentário inserido no alvéolo, chegando a 70 anos de vida com pelo menos 1/3 do comprimento da raiz radicular com suporte ósseo. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática com metanálise foi verificar qual é o nível de osso alveolar ou de inserção clínica periodontal em população adulta, ao longo da vida, identificando a prevalência de indivíduos ou de sítios periodontais que apresentam perda de inserção clínica (CAL) ≥ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 e a diferença de suporte periodontal entre dentes remanescentes e extraídos. O método empregado foi a busca estratégica nas bases PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Google Scholar, catálogo CAPES, de estudos seccionais (inquéritos epidemiológicos) que utilizaram amostras de base populacional ou estudos de coorte, publicados de 1940 a 2020, em qualquer idioma. Os estudos foram exportados para o EndNote 20.3, com seleção e extração de dados realizada por duas revisoras independentes e avaliação de risco de viés pela ferramenta JBI. O tratamento estatístico foi realizado com software R Project 1.3 e RevMan 5. Os resultados foram a identificação de 9952 estudos, 740 excluídos na identificação, 8996 na triagem, restando 216 elegíveis, incluídos 21 na revisão. Obteve-se na metanálise medida de prevalência sumária de indivíduos com CAL ≥ 3 de 0.86% (IC 95%, 0.71-0.94); CAL ≥ 4 de (0.18-0.47), CAL ≥ 5 de 0.40 % (IC 95%, 0.19-0.67), CAL ≥ 7 de 0.06 (0.02-0.13) por idade 20-40, 41-60, 71+ anos. Houve associação significativa entre perda de inserção de CAL ≥ 1 mm e local de estudos (continente americano), sendo 91.41% da variância real dos estudos explicada pela idade. A variação de CAL em grupo < 50 anos foi de 0.62 (0.03) a 2.39 (1.27) mm, e > 50 anos, de 1.46 (0.05) a 4.90 (1.70) mm. A variação de perda óssea alveolar (ABL) foi de 20 a 79 anos, 0.2 (0.03) a 8.8 (0.5) mm; 31-65 anos, 1.32 (0.36) a 2.81 (0.93) mm. A medida sumária de diferença de média de CAL entre dentes extraídos e remanescentes foi de 1.84 (1.14-2.54) mm, sem diferença significativa dos subgrupos < 50 anos e 50 anos ou mais. A maioria dos estudos foi classificada como alto risco de viés e a avaliação GRADE do nível de certeza da evidência foi classificada como muito baixa.. A conclusão foi de que a taxa de perda óssea por década de vida, a partir dos 20 anos é fundamental para a avaliação da progressão de doença periodontal e deve ser mantida entre 0.38 a 1.5 mm para que se alcance 70 anos de vida com dente apresentando suporte periodontal. Recomenda-se a realização de mais estudos longitudinais que avaliem idade e determinantes sociais como confundidores da relação doença periodontal e desfechos de CAL ou ABL.


Decision-making in clinical dental practice is based on the use of periodontal parameters such as the level of alveolar bone and clinical attachment, disregarding the patient's age, which may result in unnecessary extractions of teeth that still have periodontal support capable of maintaining the element. tooth inserted into the socket, reaching 70 years of age with at least 1/3 of the root root length with bone support. The objective of this systematic review was to verify the level of alveolar bone or periodontal clinical attachment in an adult population, throughout life, identifying the prevalence of individuals or periodontal sites that present clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 mm and the difference in periodontal support between the remaining and extracted teeth. The method used was a strategic search in PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Google Scholar, CAPES catalog, of cross-sectional epidemiological studies (epidemiological surveys) using the population-based sample or cohort studies, published from 1940 to 2020, in any language. The studies were exported to EndNote 20.3, with data selection and extraction performed by two masked reviewers and risk of bias assessment by the JBI tools. Statistical treatment was performed using the free software R Project 1.3 and RevMan 5. The results were the identification of 9952 studies, 740 excluded in the identification, 8996 in the screening, leaving 205 eligible, and 21 articles were included in the review. In the meta-analysis, a summary prevalence measure of individuals with CAL ≥ 3 of 0.86% (95% CI, 0.71-0.94) was obtained; CAL ≥ 4 of 0.18-0.47, CAL ≥ 5 of 0.40% (95% CI, 0.19-0.67), CAL ≥ 7 of 0.06 (0.02-0.13) by age 20-40, 41-60, 71+ years. There was a significant association between CAL insertion loss ≥ 1 mm and study location (american continent), with 91.41% of the real variance of the studies explained by age. The range of CAL in the < 50 years group was from 0.62 (0.03) to 2.39 (1.27) mm, and > 50 years, from 1.46 (0.05) to 4.90 (1.70) mm. The ABL (Alveolar Bone Loss) range was from 20 to 79 years from 0.2 (0.03) to 8.8 (0.5) mm and from 31 to 65 years from 1.32 (0.36) to 2.81 (0.93) mm. The summary measure of mean difference in CAL between extracted and remaining teeth was 1.84 (1.14-2.54) mm, with no a significant difference between the age subgroups < 50 years and 50 years and over. Most studies were rated as high risk of bias and the GRADE assessment of the confidence level of the evidence was rated as very low. The conclusion was that the rate of bone loss per decade of life, from the age of 20 onwards, is fundamental for the assessment of the progression of periodontal disease and should be maintained between 0.38 and 1.5 mm in order to reach 70 years of life with a tooth showing periodontal support. Further longitudinal studies are recommended to assess age and social determinants as confounders of the relationship between periodontal disease and CAL or ABL outcomes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/epidemiology , Tooth Extraction , Aging , Jaw Diseases , Prevalence
3.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e016, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1089394

ABSTRACT

Abstract Horizontal bone loss after tooth extraction is a common finding that demands bone reconstruction in various cases. The aim of this study was to assess the horizontal alveolar status in partially and completely edentulous patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). In total, 1516 CBCT scans of 1404 adult patients were analyzed. Assessment of the images was performed in accordance with the previously published horizontal alveolar change (HAC) classification, which categorizes horizontal bone defects into four classes: HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4 (from the least severe to the most severe condition). Analysis of 1048 scans from partially edentulous patients presented a distribution of 63.55%, 22.14%, 13.36% and 0.95% in HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4, respectively. Analysis of 468 scans from completely edentulous patient images presented a distribution of 19.87%, 28.63%, 41.67% and 9.83% in HAC 1, HAC 2, HAC 3 and HAC 4, respectively. Based on these results, as in HAC 4, no cancellous bone was found between the cortical buccal and lingual/palatal bone plates, it seems reasonable to state that the absence of cancellous bone is higher in completely edentulous patients than in partially edentulous patients. Therefore, the absence of cancellous bone seems to be higher in completely edentulous than in partially edentulous patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Alveolar Bone Loss/pathology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Mouth, Edentulous/pathology , Mouth, Edentulous/epidemiology , Alveolar Process/pathology , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Mouth, Edentulous/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Cancellous Bone/pathology , Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged
4.
Claves odontol ; 20(71): 9-14, nov. 2013. ilus, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-719597

ABSTRACT

Al perder los elementos dentarios, la remodelación ósea y mucosa produce una nueva estructura anatómica, el reborde residual. La reducción del reborde residual (RRR) es considerada como una enfermedad crónica, progresiva, irreversible, acumulativa en el tiempo, de etiología multifactorial. Objetivo: evaluar la pérdida del hueso alveolar en pacientes edéntulos usuarios y no de prótesis. Métodos: estudio en 115 pacientes, de 41 a 88 años, ambos sexos, edéntulos. Se realizó radiografía panorámica junto a historia clínica. Se cuantificó la altura ósea vertical, lado izquierdo y derecho, desde el borde inferior de la mandíbula al foramen mentoniano y desde el borde inferior mandibular al superior de la cresta. Se recabaron datos sobre edad, sexo, uso de prótesis dental y enfermedades sistémicas. Resultados: edad promedio 64,5 años; 71 por ciento usaba prótesis (71,91 por ciento mujeres y 28,09 por ciento varones). Hubo diferencias significativas en ambos sexos entre uso y no uso de prótesis y RRR en cada sector, derecho p=0,0173 e izquierdo p=0,0153. Los valores de RRR fueron 14,24 mm en varones y 18,03 mm en mujeres. La pérdida ósea fue mayor en mujeres posmenopáusicas y en hombres de más de 70 años. No se observaron asociaciones significativas con edad y con enfermedades sistémicas. Conclusión: la pérdida ósea aumenta en desdentados con la edad, por un factor fisiológico y pérdida de la función, el hueso no recibe fuerzas estimulantes. Las mujeres pierden más hueso que los hombres por factores hormonales propios u otros.


Subject(s)
Female , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Mouth, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Bone Resorption/physiopathology , Dental Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Data Interpretation, Statistical
5.
Rev. cuba. estomatol ; 50(1): 53-69, ene.-mar. 2013.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: lil-674100

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: determinar por el método de los elementos finitos la resistencia de dientes restaurados con postes prefabricados ante cargas estáticas de máxima intercuspidación y cargas cíclicas de masticación y bruxismo y analizar el efecto de la pérdida periodontal en la resistencia de las restauraciones. Métodos: se realizó una investigación in vitro mediante el método de los elementos finitos de dientes con pérdida periodontal, rehabilitados con postes prefabricados en fibra de vidrio, carbono y titanio. Los dientes fueron reconstruidos a partir de imágenes tomográficas de un paciente periodontalmente sano. Resultados: se muestra que ante cargas estáticas las rehabilitaciones no presentan tendencia a la falla, independientemente del material del poste o del grado de pérdida periodontal. En el caso de bruxismo y pérdida periodontal de 4 mm, la dentina presenta una durabilidad de 60 000 ciclos independiente del material del poste. Para cargas de masticación y periodonto sano, la falla en la dentina ocurre a los 100 000 ciclos con poste en titanio, 200 000 ciclos con poste en fibra de carbono y 1 100 000 ciclos con poste en fibra de vidrio. Para una pérdida periodontal de 2 mm la durabilidad de la dentina se reduce a 4 000 ciclos con poste en titanio, 5 000 ciclos con poste en fibra de carbono y 7 000 ciclos con poste en fibra de vidrio. Para pérdida periodontal de 4 mm, la durabilidad de la dentina se estima en 1 000 ciclos, independientemente del material del poste utilizado. Conclusiones: ante carga estática de máxima intercuspidación las rehabilitaciones con postes prefabricados en fibra de vidrio, carbono y titanio no presentan tendencia a la falla, independientemente del grado de pérdida periodontal. Ante cargas cíclicas, los postes prefabricados presentan una vida útil infinita, y es la dentina la estructura más afectada ante dichos eventos(AU)


Objective: using the finite element method, determine the resistance of teeth restored with prefabricated posts to maximum static intercuspidation loads, cyclical mastication loads and bruxism, and analyze the effect of periodontal loss on resistance by restorations. Methods: using the finite element method, an in vitro study was conducted of teeth with periodontal loss rehabilitated with prefabricated glass fiber, carbon and titanium posts. Reconstruction of the teeth was based on tomographic images from a periodontically healthy patient. Results: it was shown that rehabilitations did not tend to yield to static loads, irrespective of post material or the degree of periodontal loss. For bruxism and 4 mm periodontal loss, dentin durability was 60 000 cycles, irrespective of post material. For mastication loads and a healthy periodont, dentin failure occurs at 100 000 cycles with titanium posts, 200 000 cycles with carbon fiber posts, and 1 100 000 cycles with glass fiber posts. For 2 mm periodontal loss, dentin durability decreased to 4 000 cycles with titanium posts, 5 000 cycles with carbon fiber posts, and 7 000 cycles with glass fiber posts. For 4 mm periodontal loss, dentin durability is estimated at 1 000 cycles, irrespective of post material. Conclusions: restorations with glass fiber, carbon and titanium prefabricated posts do not yield to maximum static intercuspidation loads, irrespective of the degree of periodontal loss. Prefabricated posts exhibit endless resistance to cyclic loads. Dentin is the structure most severely affected by such events(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Bruxism/rehabilitation , Maxillary Diseases/etiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Finite Element Analysis/standards , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , In Vitro Techniques/methods
6.
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(3): 285-290, May-June 2010. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-557095

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of alveolar bone loss (BL) in healthy children treated at private pediatric dentistry clinics in Brasília, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research included 7,436 sites present in 885 radiographs from 450 children. The BL prevalence was estimated by measuring the distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar bone crest (ABC). Data were divided in groups: (I) No BL: distance from CEJ to ABC is <2 mm; (II) questionable BL (QBL): distance from CEJ to ABC is >2 and <3 mm; (III) definite BL (DBL): distance from CEJ to ABC >3 mm. Data were treated by the chi-square nonparametric test and Fisher's exact test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Among males, 89.31 percent were classified in group I, 9.82 percent were classified in group II and 0.85 percent in group III. Among females, 93.05 percent, 6.48 percent and 0.46 percent patients were classified in Group I, II and III, respectively. The differences between genders were not statistically significant (Chi-square test, p = 0.375). Group composition according to patients' age showed that 91.11 percent of individuals were classified as group I, 8.22 percent in group II and 0.67 percent in group III. The differences among the age ranges were not statistically significant (Chi-square test, p = 0.418). The mesial and distal sites showed a higher prevalence of BL in the jaw, QBL (89.80 percent) and DBL (79.40 percent), and no significant difference was observed in the distribution of QBL (Fisher's exact test p = 0.311) and DBL (Fisher's exact test p = 0.672) in the dental arches. The distal sites exhibited higher prevalence of both QBL (77.56 percent) and DBL (58.82 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The periodontal status of children should never be underestimated because BL occurs even in healthy populations, although in a lower frequency.


Subject(s)
Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Age Factors , Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Process , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dentition, Permanent , Prevalence , Radiography, Bitewing , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Tooth, Deciduous , Tooth Cervix
7.
Rev. AMRIGS ; 51(4): 280-284, out.-dez. 2007. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-859925

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Verificar a relação da influência do nível de densitometria mineral óssea (DOM) na perda óssea alveolar e parâmetros clínicos periodontais em mulheres na pósmenopausa. Métodos: Em um estudo seccional, foram avaliadas 23 mulheres na menopausa, com idade variando de 44-61 anos de idade. Densitometria óssea mineral da coluna lombar e do fêmur foram obtidas pela técnica DEXA. Foram incluídos exame clínico (profundidade a sondagem, perda de inserção, profundidade a sondagem e o número de ausência dental) e radiográfico para determinar a gravidade da doença periodontal. Os dados foram comparados pelo teste t Student e correlacionados pelo teste de Pearson (r). Resultados: Das 23 mulheres, duas eram osteoporóticas, 14 osteopênicas e 7 em condi- ção de normalidade. Para as comparações dos parâmetros clínicos periodontais com o perfil da DOM não foram encontradas diferenças significativas em nenhuma das análises. O coeficiente de correlação de Pearson foi fraco e negativo quando comparada a DOM com os parâmetros periodontais. Conclusão: No presente estudo não foi encontrada uma associação entre as modificações estruturais ósseas com os parâmetros periodontais (AU)


Objective: To correlate levels of bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and periodontal clinical parameters, including radiographic alveolar bone loss in postmenopausal women. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 23 postmenopausal women. Their ages ranged from 44 to 61 years-old. BMD of the lumbar vertebra and femur were obtained through the DEXA technique. Periodontal clinical examination (probing depth, clinical attachment level and number of missing teeth) and periapical radiographs were obtained to determine the severity of periodontal disease. The data obtained was analyzed using both student t test and Pearson correlation. Results: BMD revealed that 2 participants were osteoporotic, 14 were osteopenic, and 7 were healthy. Comparisons between periodontal clinical and radiographic parameters and BMD profile, among the distinct groups, showed no statistically significant differences. The coefficient for Pearson correlation was weak and negative when comparing BMD with all periodontal parameters. Conclusion: This study showed no association between bone structural modifications and clinical and radiographic periodontal parameters (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Mandibular Diseases/etiology , Mandibular Diseases/epidemiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Bone Density , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging
8.
Braz. oral res ; 18(4): 301-305, Oct.-Dec. 2004. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-398748

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as condições clínicas periodontais de dentes anteriores com migração patológica (MDP) em pacientes com periodontite crônica generalizada e comparar a severidade de destruição periodontal entre dentes migrados e não-migrados. Foram selecionados 32 pacientes, de ambos os sexos, apresentando média de idade de 46,0 anos (± 11,6), com perda clínica de inserção em dentes anteriores e presença de algum tipo de MDP, a saber: vestibularização, diastema, inclinação proximal, giroversão ou extrusão. Os parâmetros avaliados foram a perda clínica de inserção (PIC) e o percentual de perda óssea radiográfica (PO). Os resultados mostraram, em média, uma PIC de 5,50 mm (± 2,20 mm) e uma PO de 41,90% (± 15,40%) do comprimento radicular, em 115 dentes selecionados. Os tipos mais freqüentes de migração foram vestibularização (34,80%) e presença de diastemas (27,00%). A extrusão foi a menos freqüente (4,30%). Maiores valores de PO e PIC foram registrados nos dentes com extrusão (59,44% e 8,42 mm) e vestibularização (45,17% e 6,07 mm). Esses valores de PO foram superiores aos observados nos dentes com giroversão ou inclinação proximal (p < 0,05 - Kruskal-Wallis). A PIC não apresentou diferenças significativas entre os diferentes tipos de migração (p = 0,11). Constatou-se que os dentes anteriores com MDP apresentaram maior PIC e PO (5,1 mm e 40%) quando comparados aos não-migrados (4,1 mm e 31%). Pôde-se concluir também que o tipo de MDP mais prevalente foi a vestibularização, que esteve relacionada a maiores níveis de perda óssea.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss/complications , Periodontal Attachment Loss/complications , Tooth Migration/epidemiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Prevalence , Periodontal Attachment Loss/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tooth Migration/classification , Tooth Migration/etiology
9.
Univ. odontol ; 17(36): 9-17, sept. 1998. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-243367

ABSTRACT

El propósito del presente estudio fue establecer la prevalencia de la pérdida ósea periodontal, según los parámetros de severidad y tipo de pérdida, en relación con las características de edad, sexo y tipo de diente afectado, por medio de un estudio radiográfico obtenido de los pacientes que asisten a la Facultad de Odontología de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Se estudiaron juegos periapicales completos en 309 pacientes entre 30 y 60 años, distribuidos en tres grupos. Para evaluar el nivel del hueso alveolar, se tomaron las dos superficies proximales mesial y distal. Los resultados mostraron que la prevalencia de la pérdida ósea periodontal en esta población es alta, ya que el 96.75 por ciento de los pacientes estudiados presentaron algún tipo de pérdida ósea. En relación con la edad, se encontró que es un factor determinante en el progreso de la pérdida ósea y que a medida que ésta avanza, la pérdida ósea que se presenta muestra patrones de mayor severidad, tanto en el tipo horizontal como en el vertical y tanto en la superficies mesial como en la distal, se presentó más en el sexo masculino, mientras que en la pérdida ósea de tipo vertical, las diferencias entre ambos sexos no fueron significativas. Los dientes incisivos, tanto superiores como inferiores, presentaron la mayor frecuencia de pérdida ósea horizontal y la menor frecuencia los caninos, mientras que para el tipo de pérdida vertical la relación fue a la inversa


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnosis , Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Alveolar Bone Loss , Periodontal Diseases/etiology , Bicuspid/pathology , Bicuspid , Stratified Sampling , Risk Factors , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Cuspid/pathology , Cuspid , Incisor/pathology , Incisor , Molar/pathology , Molar , Analysis of Variance , Multivariate Analysis , Chi-Square Distribution , Age Distribution , Sex Distribution , Epidemiology, Descriptive
10.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-156396

ABSTRACT

El consenso de opiniones profesionales es que el paciente geriátrico con pérdida moderada de hueso alveolar tiene un mejor pronóstico que el paciente más joven con la misma cantidad de destrucción gingival y ósea, y además que aunque existan cambios anatómicos y fisiológicos en el periodoncio que envejece, el significado clínico de estos cambios es desconocido. Los pacientes geriátricos presentan varios grados de complicación periodontal. Muchos pueden ser tratados con sólo cuidados caseros y alisamiento radicular, casos tipo I y II (gingivitis e inicio de periodontitis). La mayoría de casos parece que pertenecen a periodontitis moderada, casos tipo II a III (inicio de periodontitis a periodontitis moderada), en los que las instrucciones en cuidados caseros, la fase inicial de preparación y algunas correcciones quirúrgicas necesitan ser realizadas para controlar la enfermedad periodontal. Un pequeño porcentaje de pacientes de edad, se presentan con periodontitis avanzada y gran movilidad dental, casos tipo IV (periodontitis avanzada). Algunos de estos dientes no tienen esperanza de conservación, mientras que otros requieren el tratamiento combinado periodontal restaurador. Muchos de los pacientes geriátricos se presentan con dientes fracturados, ya sea por la presencia de restauraciones previamente existentes y/o debido al incremento de la fragilidad de esas piezas dentarias. Habrá necesidad de realizar procedimientos quirúrgicos de alargamiento de la corona. Se ha observado clinicamente que la cicatrización postquirúrgica es similar a la de otros grupos de edades, y en algunos casos parece tener una naturaleza más rápida. Hay una especulación con respecto a estos pacientes, en el sentido que no tienen horario o actividades de tensión, no trabajos estresantes, no han sido fumadores exagerados; todo esto puede influenciar en la respuesta de cicatrización periodontal; estos individuos son sobrevivientes tanto en su salud general como en su dentición remanente. Los pacientes geriátricos tienen el tiempo para ser sometidos a terapia periodontal y pueden tener los medios económicos para soportar un tratamiento moderado a extenso


Subject(s)
Geriatric Dentistry/standards , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Periodontal Diseases/surgery , Periodontal Diseases/therapy , Alveolar Bone Loss/epidemiology , Dental Caries , Dental Scaling , Gingivitis/therapy , Periodontitis/classification , Periodontitis/therapy , Periodontium/physiopathology , Gingival Recession/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL